![]() ![]() Hewitt: “Will you be talking about the Uyghurs in your campaign?” NOT READY FOR PRIMETIME - Miami Mayor FRANCIS SUAREZ had a bit of a GARY JOHNSON/Aleppo moment on HUGH HEWITT’s show today, raising questions about how prepared he is to tackle foreign policy matters on the national stage. The Supreme Court’s next opinions, as it barrels toward the end of its summer recess, will come Thursday. KAY IVEY today teed up a special session of the state legislature July 17 to create new congressional district boundaries, after the Supreme Court’s ruling earlier this month required the creation of a second majority-Black House seat in the state. ![]() That said, such interventions themselves could end up back at the Supreme Court: Roberts cautioned state judges not to go too far, as Zach Montellaro and Josh Gerstein report. The makeup of both states’ supreme courts has shifted recently to the left, which opens the door for them to undo a Republican gerrymander (in Wisconsin) or impose a Democratic one (in New York). (Expect a new, more GOP-friendly map there soon.)īut the Roberts decision could give Wisconsin and New York more of a green light to draw new maps favorable to Democrats. In North Carolina, where the state supreme court flipped last year to conservative control, the Republican majority has already overturned its previous ruling and determined that it won’t check any partisan gerrymandering from the legislature. The political implications: The ruling, which largely maintains the status quo, is more notable for the changes it will prevent than for the changes it will inspire. In nuanced dissents, that is in part where Justices CLARENCE THOMAS, SAMUEL ALITO and NEIL GORSUCH came down - and even they did not issue complete endorsements of the independent state legislature theory. The surprising part: ISLT’s prospects had looked dim at oral arguments, but the full-throated ruling against it on the merits still came as something of a consequential surprise, as some observers had expected the court might simply rule the case moot and sidestep the bigger question. Though its principal application would have been for election laws and redistricting, some DONALD TRUMP allies tried to wield the theory in their efforts to overturn the 2020 election as well. Legal activists on the right had sought to empower state legislatures further, while opponents warned that a radical change could give legislatures the unchecked ability to gerrymander and more. The context: North Carolina Republicans had sought to overturn that precedent in a case that centered on the state’s congressional map, employing what was once a fringe conservative theory in an attempt to upend the balance of power over election rules. “The Elections Clause does not insulate state legislatures from the ordinary exercise of state judicial review,” Roberts writes. ![]() The ruling: The opinion from Chief Justice JOHN ROBERTS, who was joined by the court’s three liberals and Justices AMY CONEY BARRETT and BRETT KAVANAUGH, maintains the right of state courts to review state legislatures’ laws for federal elections. Harper, foreclosing what experts had warned would be a radical way for state legislatures to amass unfettered power over elections. | Mario Tama/Getty ImagesĭEMOCRACY ON THE DOCKET - The Supreme Court today rejected the “independent state legislature theory” with a 6-3 ruling in Moore v. ![]() The opinion from Chief Justice John Roberts maintains the right of state courts to review state legislatures’ laws for federal elections. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |